Final answer:
The statement is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The scenario you're describing involves concepts from Einstein's theory of relativity. Specifically, it addresses a fundamental principle of relativity that the speed of light in a vacuum, denoted as c, is constant and is not dependent on the observer's motion. Whether you are stationary or moving at nearly the speed of light, if you turn on a light, it will still move away from you at the speed of light, which is approximately 299,792 kilometers per second (or about 186,282 miles per second).
This is a mind-bending concept because it defies our traditional experiences with velocities; we are used to seeing them add up. However, with light, this is not the case due to the relativistic effects predicted by Einstein and confirmed by experiments.
Furthermore, if you were travelling at nearly the speed of light and observed an object moving at light speed, an observer at rest would also see the object moving at light speed, not at a speed that exceeds c. This holds true due to the relativistic rule that the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames of reference, which is one of the cornerstones of modern physics.
So, when discussing light travel time, it's crucial to understand that what we observe, such as a star's light or throwing a ball forward at nearly light speed, is subject to the laws of relativity. As a consequence, our understanding of the universe is limited by this constant speed of light, and events we observe have actually occurred much earlier than when we're able to detect them.