Final answer:
To objectively evaluate both realistic and non-objective works of art, one can consider technical skill and craftsmanship, as well as the artwork's ability to convey meaning and evoke emotions.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating both realistic and non-objective works of art, it is possible to apply objective criteria to assess their artistic quality. One approach is to consider the technical skill and craftsmanship demonstrated in the artwork. For example, in realistic art, attention to detail, use of perspective, and accurate representation of subject matter can be assessed objectively. In non-objective art, the use of color, composition, and balance can be objectively evaluated.
Another aspect to consider is the artwork's ability to convey meaning or evoke emotions. While the interpretation of the artwork may be subjective, the effectiveness of using artistic elements and principles to convey a specific theme or provoke a particular response can be objectively evaluated. For instance, in both realistic and non-objective art, the use of color, line, and form can be objectively analyzed to determine how they contribute to the overall artistic message.