207k views
2 votes
The differences in their opinions about the value of Scripture are as follows:

•Tyndale affirms that __________to the Holy Spirit is all that is needed to _______ the Bible properly; therefore, direct study is __________ ___ ________.

a) Inner illumination; interpret; not necessary
b) Intellectual insight; misinterpret; crucial
c) Scholastic learning; analyze; highly recommended
d) Rational reasoning; understand; absolutely required

User Matty F
by
8.8k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Tyndale's opinion on Scripture places emphasis on inner illumination by the Holy Spirit for proper Bible interpretation, making rigorous study unnecessary; this aligns with the reformation ideals of personal connection with the divine.

Step-by-step explanation:

The differences in opinions about the value of Scripture between Tyndale and others are centered on the belief that inner illumination to the Holy Spirit is all that is needed to interpret the Bible properly; therefore, direct study is not necessary. Tyndale's views reflect those of many early reformers who emphasized a personal connection with the divine through the Holy Spirit, as opposed to the then-traditional emphasis on institutional teachings and scholastic learning. The invention of the printing press and the translation of the Bible into the vernacular played a crucial role in this shift, as it allowed individuals to read and understand the Bible directly, thus supporting the viewpoint that one does not necessarily need to rely on a priest or church officials for proper interpretation.

User Trevorc
by
8.4k points