Final answer:
The costs of taxation in the form of deadweight loss often lead to a reduction in society's surplus, as taxes can prevent mutually beneficial market transactions from occurring. However, environmental taxes that address negative externalities can result in overall net benefits. Over time, it may be more effective to embrace market-oriented policies to balance costs and benefits.
Step-by-step explanation:
The costs of taxation can often lead to a loss of surplus for society. When taxes include taxes, markets, and property rights in a way that causes negative externalities, these costs can result in society bearing a greater social cost. In the realm of U.S. environmental laws, for instance,
it has been shown that the benefits have historically outweighed the costs, but at increasing levels of regulation, the marginal costs tend to increase and the marginal benefits decrease. This situation calls for more cost-effective and flexible market-oriented environmental policies.
In terms of deadweight loss, which is a decline in total surplus resulting from an inefficient level of production, both consumer and producer surplus could be higher absent this loss. Deadweight loss can occur due to taxation when it prevents market transactions that would benefit both buyers and sellers, representing a loss of potential mutual benefits from market activities.