130k views
1 vote
Frantically calls 911. When the police and ambulance arrive they question

Susan and retrieve the murder weapon.
After being questioned by the police, Susan is held in jail. There is
significant evidence to suspect that Susan may have committed a crime, and
so shortly after she is formally charged.

What part of criminal law procedure is
happening here?
What did Susan refuse?

User Jett Hsieh
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The criminal law procedure taking place is suspect interrogation and formal charging after arrest, which should be preceded by informing the suspect of their Miranda rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.

Step-by-step explanation:

The part of criminal law procedure that is happening here involves suspect interrogation and the formal charging of a suspect after an arrest has been made. Initially, the police have gathered evidence, questioned the suspect, and taken them into custody based on that evidence.

The suspect, Susan, is then formally accused of the crime and taken to jail. This process is directly related to the Miranda v. Arizona decision, which mandates that suspects must be informed of their Miranda rights before being interrogated to protect against self-incrimination.

In this scenario, it appears that Susan may have refused to provide an incriminating statement, invoking her right to remain silent and perhaps the right to an attorney as specified by her Miranda rights.

User Csaladenes
by
8.2k points