Final answer:
Video and voice traffic often uses TCP due to its reliability and ordered transmission, though real-world applications typically use UDP for its efficiency in real-time communications. The question contains a misconception, as UDP is more common for streaming services. Net Neutrality affects how data is prioritized and transmitted across networks, including TCP and UDP usage.
Step-by-step explanation:
The delivery of voice and video traffic over the Internet often utilizes TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) instead of UDP (User Datagram Protocol) for several key reasons. While UDP is indeed faster and more efficient for real-time communication because of its non-reliant approach to data transmission, which doesn't require acknowledgment of packet receipt, TCP is favored in environments where reliability and data integrity are prioritized. TCP provides crucial features—reliable data transfer, ordered data transmission, and congestion control mechanisms, which ensures that all data packets arrive in order and intact, even if this introduces a slight delay.
However, it's worth noting that the statement presented in the question contains a misconception—video and voice traffic is more commonly sent over UDP in real-world applications, such as VoIP and streaming services, where momentary lapses in data transmission (like minor packet loss) are tolerable and preferable over the delays introduced by TCP's rigorous data recovery processes.
The debate of Net Neutrality is indeed a concern when it comes to internet infrastructure and the delivery of data, including TCP and UDP protocols, as it affects how content (video, voice, or otherwise) is prioritized and transmitted across networks. Net neutrality argues for a level playing field where data packets are treated equally, preventing scenarios where service providers might prioritize certain traffic in exchange for additional fees, potentially stifacing innovation and freedom on the Internet.