Final answer:
Jade's argument in the context of the military is a persuasive statement or thesis against the discriminatory practice of barring LGBTQ individuals from military service, drawing parallels between this and historical racial discrimination.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jade used this as part of her persuasive argument or thesis statement which deals with military discrimination based on sexual orientation. Her argument compares the discriminatory practices of the past and present, asserting that denying gay people from serving in the military is analogous to racial discrimination — both being morally and ethically wrong. The history of LGBTQ discrimination in the military is fraught with injustices, including the implementation of Directive 1332.14 in the 1980s which made homosexuality a mandatory disqualification, leading to the controversial 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' (DADT) policy. Activism has played a significant role in overturning discriminatory policies, with President Obama repealing DADT in 2011, and the Biden administration lifting a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military in 2021.