173k views
0 votes
A patient with a known exposure to Hepatitis B 3 weeks earlier has negative results for all markers when a Hepatitis profile is performed, except for IgM and anti-HBc. What is a possible reason for this result?

A. The wrong patient specimen was tested?
B. A false-negative result was caused by technical error
C. HBsAg was still too low in concentration to detect
D. Anti-HBs titer had already peaked and was no longer detectable

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

A positive result for IgM and anti-HBc in a patient with a known exposure to Hepatitis B likely indicates a recent acute infection with the virus. HBsAg may still be too low to detect, and it's too early for the anti-HBs titer to have peaked and declined. This eliminates concerns over false-negatives, specimen errors, or issues of titer decline.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a patient has a known exposure to Hepatitis B and tests negative for all markers except for IgM and anti-HBc three weeks later, this could indicate recent infection with the virus. The presence of IgM anti-HBc suggests that the infection is acute, as IgM antibodies are typically produced shortly after infection before other markers become positive. At this stage, the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) may still be at too low a concentration to be detected (Option C). This means that the infection is still in the early phases, and additional markers may appear as the infection progresses.

Detection of these antibodies through serological testing is crucial as it provides information about Hepatitis B infection status. The fact that other markers are negative and IgM anti-HBc is positive rules out the possibility of a false negative (Option B) or that the wrong patient specimen was tested (Option A), and it is too soon for the anti-HBs titer to have peaked and declined (Option D). A primary focus in such a scenario is to monitor the patient for signs of liver damage and consider post-exposure treatment.

User Greut
by
7.9k points