Final answer:
The temperance movement's link to new social conditions is true, stemming from challenges like urbanization and immigration. The statement on Proprietors in proprietary colonies is false, as they had administration responsibilities beyond profit collection.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that private events cannot profit from the sale of alcohol or used for personal gain, or to help a business is not directly related to the provided reference information. However, regarding the temperance movement, the assertion that it stemmed in part from new social conditions such as increasing urbanization and immigration is True. The temperance movement indeed arose as a social response to the challenges brought on by these changes.
In relation to proprietary colonies, it is False that the Proprietors have no responsibilities except to collect the profits. Proprietors in a proprietary colony were responsible for the administration and governance of the colony, not just for profit collection.