Final answer:
The statement about the legal responsibilities of alcohol service being the same for private clubs, special events, and community fundraisers as for profit businesses is true. Proprietors in proprietary colonies did indeed have more responsibilities than just collecting profits, indicating that the claim they had no responsibilities except for profit collection is false. The statement that the temperance movement origins were influenced by urbanization and immigration is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that private clubs, special events, and community fundraisers have the same legal responsibilities as businesses that sell or serve liquor for profit is True. Whether an organization is for-profit or not, when it comes to the service of alcohol, there are generally strict regulations in place to ensure public safety. These responsibilities include, but are not limited to, checking identification to verify legal drinking age, refraining from serving intoxicated individuals, and securing appropriate licenses for the sale and service of alcohol. These laws and regulations are designed to prevent alcohol-related harm and to impose liability on those who serve alcohol for any consequences that may arise from its service.
It is also important to address the misunderstandings regarding proprietary colonies. In a proprietary colony, the proprietors had several responsibilities beyond simply collecting profits. This includes b. False, as proprietors were often responsible for establishing a government, managing relations with Indigenous populations, and upholding the colony's overall welfare.
Finally, the question regarding the temperance movement is also noteworthy. It is True that the temperance movement stemmed in part from new social conditions such as increasing urbanization and immigration. These social changes brought about concerns over the social ills associated with alcohol, fueling the movement for moderation or complete abstinence in alcohol consumption.