Final answer:
Effective evidence is precise, sourced from verifiable facts, and tailored to the argument and audience's expectations. Actual numbers add credibility over approximations, and alignment with disciplinary standards is crucial. Always cite your sources to provide evidence integrity.
Step-by-step explanation:
Evidence is more effective when it is rooted in verifiable facts and experience. When determining what type of evidence to use, it is essential to understand that the effectiveness of evidence depends on how well it supports the topic and the argument being presented. While a large number of statistics can provide a thorough understanding, an overload can overwhelm an audience. Using actual numbers instead of approximations can lend precision and credibility to your argument, as precise figures are generally more persuasive than vague estimates. Therefore, evidence involving actual numbers, when they contribute to a clear and focused argument, can be more effective in supporting a claim.
It is also critical to ensure that the evidence aligns with the requirements of your field and meets your instructor's requirements. For example, evidence that convinces a professor in the arts may differ significantly from what is needed to persuade a science instructor. Therefore, familiarity with the type of evidence that is valued in your particular discipline is paramount.
Moreover, always cite any evidence you use from a source to uphold the integrity of your work and to provide the opportunity for your audience to verify the information for themselves. In short, evidence should be tailored to best support the angle taken on a topic while meeting both the audience's expectations and disciplinary standards. This approach can result in the creation of a compelling and convincing argument supported by strong evidence.