Final answer:
Bank of Montreal v Duguid is a Contract Law case involving two private parties, indicating it is a civil case concerning a contractual dispute.
Step-by-step explanation:
The case Bank of Montreal v Duguid would be considered a Contract Law case. This is because it involves two private parties: the Bank of Montreal and an individual, Duguid. The nature of civil law cases is such that they involve disputes between private parties, rather than the government charging an individual with a crime, as would be the case in criminal law. In the context of this case, the dispute likely revolves around obligations that have arisen from contractual agreements. This is distinctly different from criminal cases which are represented by government entities charging an individual due to conduct deemed to harm society. Examples of criminal law cases include government versus individuals, such as in Miranda v. Arizona, and corporate crimes such as embezzlement.