Final answer:
The false statement about inducing a breach of contract is that it is only applicable to written contracts. Such inducement can apply to both written and oral agreements, and a person who induces a breach may be liable for damages.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement regarding inducing a breach of contract that is false is D) Inducing breach of contract is only applicable in cases involving written contracts. Inducing a breach of contract can occur in both written and oral agreements. The key element is not the form of the contract, but whether one party intentionally causes a third party to break a contractual obligation.
To clarify the other options: A) is a description of breach of contract rather than inducing a breach. B) is correct in that inducing breach of contract involves intentionally causing a third party to break their contractual obligation. C) is also correct as a person who induces a breach of contract may indeed be held legally responsible for damages.