Final answer:
The statement is false; unlike the U.S., many countries have stricter evidence collection laws with greater privacy protections. The adversarial system and exclusionary rule in the U.S. require evidence to be lawfully obtained, which is not a standard practice globally.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement is False: Most countries do not have broad discovery rules like those of the U.S., which allow for the extensive collection of evidence. The U.S. legal system features an adversarial judicial system, where disclosure, or the requirement to share evidence between the parties, is fundamental. In contrast, many other nations have more restrictive approaches to evidence collection, often with tighter privacy protections and restrictions against government surveillance, in part due to historical experiences with authoritarian regimes. These differences are especially evident when considering laws like Europe's strong privacy laws and recent court cases like Carpenter v. United States which emphasize the need for a search warrant to gather phone location data.
In the U.S., the exclusionary rule prevents illegally seized evidence from being used in court, a principle that is not universally applied in all countries. Additionally, the UN has set forth recommendations for best policing practices to limit search and seizure activities to reasonable standards, which not all countries follow, giving more leeway to law enforcement in some jurisdictions.