Final answer:
Project management 'good enough' prioritizes efficiency and meeting objectives within deadlines, while 'perfectionism' places an emphasis on flawlessness, which can lead to missing critical deadlines and lost opportunities, such as market entry timing in engineering projects.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distinction between project management good enough and perfectionism lies in the approach to completing tasks and managing projects. Project management that is 'good enough' focuses on achieving goals within reasonable standards, adhering to deadlines, and ensuring that the project meets its primary objectives effectively and efficiently. This strategy acknowledges that while not every aspect may be flawless, the overall project can still be successful and impactful.
Conversely, perfectionism in project management involves striving for flawlessness in every detail, which can often lead to excessive time spent on tasks and potentially missing critical deadlines. This approach can be counterproductive, particularly in industries like engineering where multiple projects, deadlines, and team collaboracies are commonplace. As the video game controller example illustrates, hitting the market by a specific time can be more crucial than achieving absolute perfection, indicating the necessity of prioritizing timeliness to capture market opportunities and avoid substantial revenue losses.