Final answer:
It is typically true that quantifiable standards are better for measurement in science, as they allow for accuracy and repeatability. Standardized measurements are essential for consistency and larger sample sizes tend to provide more reliable data in scientific experiments.
Step-by-step explanation:
Standards are often best measured when they can be quantified which is typically true. Quantifiable standards allow for precise and objective measurement, which is crucial in scientific experiments where accuracy and repeatability are necessary. Accurate measurements, such as those of the length of standard computer paper, are obtained when they are close to the correct value or standard set and can be compared across different contexts due to standardized units. These standardized measurements enable consistent communication about quantities and values. Moreover, in science, larger sample sizes are generally better than smaller ones because they tend to yield more reliable data and help mitigate the potential effects of outliers or random variation. This helps to ensure that scientific findings are not the result of chance but rather reflect true effects or differences.