Final answer:
In the criteria area, criteria to select records should be standards or requirements relevant to the purpose of the evaluation. These can include factors like age, size, brightness for stars, or relevance and accuracy for reviews. Criteria are fluid and may differ based on genre, audience, and the specific evidence used for evaluation.
Step-by-step explanation:
When selecting records in the criteria area, the criteria that should be entered largely depend on the objectives of the search or evaluation and the specific context in which the data will be analyzed. In general, criteria are the standards or requirements based on which records are evaluated and selected. Criteria are used to determine the relevance, quality, or suitability of the records for a particular purpose.
For example, if you are evaluating stars and considering their life stories and timescales, as stated in your provided context, your criteria might include the star's age, size, brightness, and distance from Earth. If you are conducting a review, the evaluation criteria might consist of relevance to the subject, accuracy, methodological soundness, and impact. It's essential to make these evaluation criteria clear and justify why each criterion is necessary for the evaluation to maintain transparency and objectivity.
Evaluation criteria can be fluid and may vary depending on the genre or subgenre, the audience for the evaluation, and the intended use of the evaluation. They can pertain to qualitative research data, quantitative research data, or a mix of both, and it's vital to use objective evidence to support judgments based on these criteria. Additionally, identifying constraints is also crucial as they dictate conditions that must be satisfied for the data or design to be considered suitable.