Final answer:
The likely outcome for Kevin suing Curtiss Group for failure to fulfill a contract depends on several factors, including proving a breach of contract, demonstrating harm, and whether a jury is present. Kevin could potentially win compensation, but without further details, answer 2 is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
If Kevin, a disadvantaged youth, sues Curtiss Group for failure to fulfill Cincinnati's summer program contract, several outcomes are possible depending on the details of the case. If Kevin can prove that Curtiss Group breached their contract and that he has suffered losses because of this breach,
Option 1, wherein Kevin wins the case and receives compensation, is a likely outcome. The court will need to consider the evidence presented, and if a jury is involved, they might be influenced by the social aspects of the case and recommend damages to be awarded to Kevin.
Option 2 suggests the court dismissing the case due to lack of standing. For Kevin to have standing, he must show that he has been directly harmed by Curtiss Group's action or lack thereof. If he fails to demonstrate this, the court might dismiss his case.
Option 3 is less likely unless there are specific regulatory violations for which Curtiss Group could be fined, but fines do not necessarily relate to fulfilling contract terms. Lastly, Option 4 could occur if Cincinnati was responsible for enforcing the contract; however, without more context, the responsibility cannot be accurately determined.
Without the specifics of the case, including evidence and legal arguments, predicting the exact outcome is challenging. Factors such as the value at stake in the dispute, whether a jury is present, and how the actual trial proceeds (bench trial or otherwise) will play a crucial role in the decision-making process. answer 2 is correct