148k views
0 votes
Look at the infographic entitled "Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule" on

page 368 of your textbook. How well do each of the four exceptions
protect an individual's 4th Amendment right against unlawful searches
and seizures? Rank each exception in order, from most protective to
least protective. Explain your rankings. Use information from the text to
support your rankings.

1 Answer

4 votes

The four exceptions to the exclusionary rule are inevitable discovery, independent source, attenuation, and good faith.

Based on the available search results, the four exceptions to the exclusionary rule are inevitable discovery, independent source, attenuation, and good faith. These exceptions allow evidence that would otherwise be excluded under the exclusionary rule to be admitted in court.

In terms of how well each exception protects an individual's 4th Amendment right against unlawful searches and seizures, it is difficult to rank them definitively as they each have their own strengths and weaknesses. However, some possible rankings and explanations are:

Inevitable discovery: This exception allows evidence to be admitted if it would have been discovered through lawful means anyway. It is considered the most protective exception as it ensures that evidence is not excluded if it would have been discovered regardless of any illegal police conduct.

Independent source: This exception allows evidence to be admitted if it was obtained through a source independent of any illegal police conduct. It is also a protective exception as it ensures that evidence is not excluded if it was obtained through a lawful source.

Attenuation: This exception allows evidence to be admitted if the connection between the illegal police conduct and the evidence is too remote or attenuated. It is less protective than the first two exceptions as it allows evidence to be admitted even if there is some connection to the illegal conduct.

Good faith: This exception allows evidence to be admitted if the police acted in good faith when conducting the search or seizure, even if the conduct was later found to be unconstitutional. It is considered the least protective exception as it allows evidence to be admitted even if the police violated an individual's constitutional rights.

Complete question:

How well do each of the four exceptions protect an individual's 4th Amendment right against unlawful searches and seizures? Rank each exception in order, from most protective to least protective. Explain your rankings. Use information from the text to support your rankings.

User Nico Mee
by
8.2k points