Final answer:
Negotiations may often fail due to diametrically opposed goals, power imbalances leading to coercion, and the unpredictability of collective action problem resolutions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Negotiations may not be viable to resolve proceedings for several reasons.
One key reason is that parties involved may have diametrically opposed goals, which means they have objectives that are completely opposite of each other.
In situations where one party's goal is to raise taxes, and the other aims to lower them, there is no middle ground that will satisfy both, leading to a breakdown in negotiations.
Additionally, if participants in a negotiation have the power to force concessions from others, they might use it, which can lead to bullying or unfair practices.
Finally, the resolution of collective action problems depends on the unpredictable decisions of those involved, further complicating negotiations.