Final answer:
Payne is likely using an ethical appeal in lines 37-47 to establish credibility and persuade his audience. Specific examples from the lines would provide a clearer evaluation, and without them, we can only speculate that he uses authoritative sources to enhance ethos. The analysis may also need to include how Payne's ethical appeal relates to other rhetorical strategies like logos and pathos.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to an analysis of a rhetorical strategy, specifically the use of an ethical appeal (ethos) in a given text. An ethical appeal aims to establish the credibility or trustworthiness of the speaker or writer. In the context of lines 37-47, Payne is presumably attempting to enhance his own credibility on the subject at hand. The result Payne is calculating from this use of an ethical appeal might be to convince his audience of the integrity of his position or the reliability of his arguments.
Without the actual text from lines 37-47, it's challenging to give a precise evaluation. Typically, citation of authoritative sources like Hamilton and Darity Jr., or institutions such as The Ohio State University, as seen in the reference, helps to bolster the writer's credibility and persuade the audience by demonstrating thorough research and reputable backing for the arguments presented.
If the peer's evaluation indicates that Trumbore uses pathos by urging readers to understand her position, the peer may be asked to provide specific text examples showing how Trumbore has appealed to the audience's emotions to understand her position. For a balanced rhetorical analysis, the evaluation may also need to include insights into how Payne's ethical appeal supports his logical (logos) arguments or how it interacts with emotional appeals (pathos).