Final answer:
Raising livestock would conflict with nomadic hunter-gatherers' lifestyles, as it entails breeding and managing large herds that necessitate periodic movement to new pastures, unlike settled agriculture which allows for permanent settlements.
Step-by-step explanation:
Raising livestock as a form of agriculture would have been difficult for nomadic hunter-gatherers because it requires significant changes to their lifestyle and potentially the environment. Pastoral societies such as the Maasai villagers relied on domesticating animals for food, clothing, transportation, and trade. Unlike hunter-gatherers, pastoral groups were able to create a surplus of goods but had to remain nomadic to provide fresh pastures for their larger herds, which is a key distinction from agricultural societies that are more stationary because of their crop cultivation.
Pastoral societies were structured around various strategies of nomadism and transhumance, where mobility is necessary, and this mobility discourages the accumulation of private property other than herd animals. In contrast, agricultural societies could build permanent settlements thanks to stable food sources derived from cultivated crops and smaller herds of domesticated animals.
Adopting pastoralism would have been a challenge for hunter-gatherers who were accustomed to a highly mobile lifestyle that relied on hunting and foraging. The transition to pastoralism represented an intermediate step between pure nomadic existence and the more settled agricultural lifestyle that led to the development of cities and more complex societal structures.