50.4k views
2 votes
What do you suppose are some of the most commonly described disadvantages to the use of rigid body armor by law enforcement officers? Select all that apply.

Responses

It is heavier and makes it more difficult to run extended distances.
It is heavier and makes it more difficult to run extended distances.

The material from which the armor is made is fluorescent and makes it difficult for officers to move undetected.
The material from which the armor is made is fluorescent and makes it difficult for officers to move undetected.

It significantly increases the officer’s body temperature, which is tiring, particularly in very warm weather.
It significantly increases the officer’s body temperature, which is tiring, particularly in very warm weather.

It limits the officer’s ability to make sudden and necessary movements from the waist up.
It limits the officer’s ability to make sudden and necessary movements from the waist up.

User Lam Le
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The disadvantages of using rigid body armor by law enforcement officers include increased weight, limited mobility, and increased body temperature.

Step-by-step explanation:

Some of the most commonly described disadvantages to the use of rigid body armor by law enforcement officers include:

  1. It is heavier and makes it more difficult to run extended distances.
  2. It limits the officer’s ability to make sudden and necessary movements from the waist up.
  3. It significantly increases the officer’s body temperature, which is tiring, particularly in very warm weather.

User Joao Victor
by
7.4k points