Final answer:
Woodrow Wilson rejected prior foreign policies favoring intervention known as "Big Stick" and "Dollar Diplomacy," advocating for a less imperialistic approach and moral-based decision-making in international affairs. His efforts were complicated by the global tensions leading to WWI.
Step-by-step explanation:
President Wilson's View on Predecessor’s Foreign Policies
President Woodrow Wilson rejected both Theodore Roosevelt's "Big Stick" policy and William Howard Taft's "Dollar Diplomacy". Roosevelt's policy involved the threat of military force instead of its actual use for achieving the United States' foreign policy goals. Conversely, Taft's Dollar Diplomacy aimed to use American economic strength to influence international affairs, particularly in Latin America, where he tried to replace military intervention with economic incentives to promote stability and beneficial agreements for the U.S.
Wilson, who succeeded Taft, planned a more restrained foreign policy. He believed that the U.S. should not intervene in other nations’ affairs unless a moral imperative existed. However, as global tensions increased with the onset of World War I, Wilson found it difficult to keep the U.S. out of international conflicts, despite his initial intentions.
Final answer in 2 lines: Woodrow Wilson rejected both Roosevelt's Big Stick policy and Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, wishing to intervene globally only on a moral basis. Ultimately, he found it challenging to maintain this stance in the face of rising global tensions.