Final answer:
To decide Alabama v. Shelton based on precedent, the principle of stare decisis and factors like societal changes, court composition, and evolving interpretations of equal protection and due process should be considered. While courts respect historical cases, they also adapt to modern contexts, which could influence the outcome.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering how Alabama v. Shelton should be decided, based on the application of precedent, we must keep in mind the principle of stare decisis. This legal doctrine suggests that courts should follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case, unless there is a strong justification to disregard precedent.
Factors that may influence the court's decision include changes in society, legal interpretations, or new information that was not available during the earlier case. Moreover, the composition of the court itself might change, leading to different judicial philosophies influencing the interpretation of the law.
For example, Brown v. Board of Education overruled Plessy v. Ferguson, and Lawrence v. Texas overturned Bowers v. Hardwick, showcasing that while precedent guides decisions, it is not an absolute constraint. Additionally, the case of Shelby County v. Holder highlighted how constitutional interpretations can evolve with time, reflecting changing norms and values. The application of equal protection and due process may also adjust as societal context changes.
Ultimately, the decision for Alabama v. Shelton would likely be influenced by these principles and the prevailing legal norms at the time of the decision. Courts balance the respect for precedent with the need to adapt to contemporary issues when making their rulings.