Final answer:
Swidler and Geertz disagree on the flexibility and future of anthropology as a science and a field of study.
Step-by-step explanation:
Swidler vs. Geertz disagree on the flexibility and future of anthropology as a science and a field of study.
According to Geertz, anthropology's confusion and ability to adapt reflect its strength as a science. He believes that anthropology can encompass wider areas of contemporary thought and lead into the future.
On the other hand, Swidler expresses concerns about anthropology losing its original subject matter, research isolation, and authority. Swidler argues that anthropology is besieged by scientism and hand-wringing, which undermines its integrity and influence.