Final answer:
Current research supports the idea that memory is prone to errors and false memories can be created through suggestive questioning. Elizabeth Loftus' work on the misinformation effect particularly highlights the fragility of memory and challenges the concept of accurately recovered repressed memories.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which of the following statements is most consistent with current research on the repressed/false memory debate? The current research suggests that memory reconstruction can lead to false memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect recorder of events. Cognitive psychologist Elizabeth Loftus has shown that suggestive questioning can create the misinformation effect, altering a person's recollection of an event. Additionally, repressed memories, particularly those of traumatic events like childhood abuse, have been debated with some researchers suggesting that such memories can be locked away and later recovered intact, while others, including Loftus, question the accuracy of these recovered memories and the methods used to retrieve them.
Moreover, experiments like those conducted by Ceci and Bruck reveal the ease with which children can form false memories under leading questions, which contributes to the skepticism regarding therapeutic techniques supposed to recover repressed memories. The research suggests that memories can be frail and prone to error during reconstruction, and that the concept of false memory syndrome explains cases where individuals believe they recall events that never occurred, especially in the absence of independent verification.