Answer: False analogy
Explanation:
The type of fallacy in the statement "You wouldn't go without wearing your seatbelt; why would you skip sunscreen?" is the false analogy fallacy. This fallacy occurs when two things are compared to each other, even though they are not really alike. In this case, the statement is comparing the risk of not wearing a seatbelt to the risk of not wearing sunscreen. However, the two risks are not really alike.
Wearing a seatbelt is a legal requirement in most jurisdictions, and it is a proven way to reduce the risk of serious injury or death in a car accident. Skipping sunscreen, on the other hand, is not illegal, and it is not as directly linked to a specific, immediate danger. While it is true that skipping sunscreen can increase your risk of skin cancer, this risk is not as immediate or obvious as the risk of injury or death in a car accident.
Therefore, the analogy between not wearing a seatbelt and not wearing sunscreen is a false analogy. The two risks are not really alike, and the statement is therefore fallacious.