Final answer:
Without specific context about the character Eddie, it is not possible to determine why he remains determined to continue with the court cases. The motivations, whether upholding justice, seeking revenge, gaining compensation, or avoiding conflict, would be inferred from the story's details about Eddie's character and circumstances. B) Upholding principles of justice
Step-by-step explanation:
In the context provided, there isn't enough information to definitively determine why Eddie remains determined to continue with the court cases. To deduce Eddie's motivations, one would typically look at the character's background, actions, and statements within the narrative. For example, if Eddie was portrayed as someone deeply affected by injustice or someone who frequently speaks about the principles of justice, one might conclude that B) Upholding principles of justice is his motive. Alternatively, if Eddie was portrayed as someone who had been wronged and spoke about retribution, A) Seeking personal revenge might be a plausible reason.
Without context, it is impossible to know if Eddie is motivated by C) Gaining financial compensation or D) Avoiding further conflicts. These latter options would generally be inferred from the narrative's details regarding Eddie's financial status or interactions with others. If there's an emphasis on his financial struggles or a consistent attempt to avoid confrontation, these could be considered viable motivations. However, ordinarily, considerations such as the good of the international system as a whole may align more with B) as they too reflect a principle-driven pursuit.
Whatever the case may be, a deeper understanding of the story and character's journey is essential for a conclusive answer. It should be noted that the response to why Eddie remains determined is based on generic character motivation analysis and not specific to any known storyline or case involving a character named Eddie.