Final answer:
Highly effective interventions should be supported based on their cost-effectiveness, as effective use of taxpayer money is crucial for public policy decisions. Research and the benefit-cost ratio are important factors in determining funding for early intervention or crime reduction programs.
Step-by-step explanation:
A highly effective intervention should indeed be supported, but not without considering its cost-effectiveness. As a governor responsible for managing the state budget and making decisions about funding early intervention programs, it is crucial to ensure that taxpayer money is used efficiently. These programs may prove to be highly beneficial for children from low-income backgrounds or those with special needs. However, it is important to analyze various research to determine which programs are the most effective and how they achieve these outcomes.
Investment decisions in public policy must also take into account the benefit-cost ratio. The options available that yield the highest benefits relative to their costs should be prioritized. In practical terms, this means that even a highly effective program could be disregarded if it's not cost-effective. Instead, cheaper yet still effective alternatives that provide greater overall value could be favored. For example, when considering options to reduce crime, the option that offers the best outcomes per dollar spent should be chosen.