Final answer:
John Locke argued that the people have the right to judge when a government violates natural rights, and they hold the power to initiate a revolution to overthrow such a government. It is false that Locke argues the people should not be the judge of when revolution is warranted.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is false that Locke argues the people should not be the judge of when revolution is warranted. According to John Locke's political theory, if a government violates the people's natural rights, the right of revolution entitles the people to overthrow that government. In his works, Locke clearly states that "the people shall be the judge" when it comes to determining if the ruler or legislature is acting contrary to the trust placed in them by the society.
John Locke argued that the people should be the judge of when revolution is warranted. According to Locke, if the government violated the natural rights and natural law of the people, they had the right to revolution and use force to punish the government and remove its rulers. Locke believed in the concept of popular sovereignty, where ultimate political authority rests with the people.