Final answer:
Strategic actions are harder to implement than tactical actions due to the need for long-term planning and consideration of external factors and competitor responses, whereas tactical actions are more immediate and adaptable.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is generally much harder for a competitor to implement strategic actions than tactical actions. Strategic actions involve long-term planning and often require considering the actions and responses of competitors and other external factors. Strategic actions are affected by many variables, including the different goals, imperfect information, and complex environments specific to each scenario. By contrast, tactical actions are more immediate and often involve responding to changing conditions on the ground. They can be adjusted more quickly and are not usually burdened with the same long-range considerations and uncertainties that accompany strategic planning.
For instance, in politics, acting strategically is complicated by the need to anticipate opponents' moves and deal with imperfect information. Strategy in business, just like in military or politics, requires a deep understanding of the competitive landscape and frequently involves adapting to dynamic environments. Superior strategy is typically what gives political actors or businesses an edge over their competitors, assuming other conditions are equal. Therefore, the intricacy of strategic considerations generally makes it a more challenging and involved task than executing tactical actions.