216k views
4 votes
Where there is no real conflict of interest, but a perception of a conflict exists, the best practice is to reject the engagement .

A) True
B) False

User AriG
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The statement is false. The best practice in case of a perceived conflict of interest is to disclose it and discuss possible safeguards, not necessarily to reject the engagement. Integrity and professional reputation should guide the decision-making process.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that the best practice is to reject the engagement where there is a perception of a conflict of interest, even if no real conflict exists, is False. It is quite common in the professional settings of law, accounting, and consulting, to encounter situations where there is a perceived conflict of interest.

In such cases, transparency and effective communication are key. Professionals are often encouraged to disclose the potential conflict to all affected parties and seek their consent after explaining the situation fully. This includes discussing the safeguards that will be in place to mitigate any perceived conflict.

By dealing directly with any perception of conflict, professionals can often continue with the engagement as long as the perception is addressed, and all parties are comfortable with the arrangement.

Rejection of the engagement should be a last resort, used only when the perception cannot be resolved, or it threatens to undermine the integrity or the reputation of the professional or their firm.

User Jonathan Twite
by
7.0k points