179k views
3 votes
The only time an original medical record should be released is when it is subpoenaed by a court of law.

A) TRUE
B) FALSE

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The statement is false; original medical records can be released in several instances besides being subpoenaed, including with patient consent or as authorised by law. There are also FOIA exceptions for certain records, like those for government employees.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that the only time an original medical record should be released is when it is subpoenaed by a court of law is not entirely true. While a subpoena is a legal document that requires the production of documents, including medical records, there are other circumstances in which medical records may be released. These can include the patient's consent for medical treatment, billing, healthcare operations, or when the release is authorised by law.


For instance, medical records may be released to public health authorities for the purpose of controlling disease, injury or disability. It is also important to note that there are reasonable exceptions to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), such as medical records for government employees, which are generally protected from public disclosure to preserve personal privacy.

User Myartsev
by
7.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.