Final Answer:
The argument against free university-level education due to potential student complacency lacks comprehensive evidence and fails to consider broader societal impacts. It falls in the middle ground, neither strongly opposing nor supporting free education for all students.Thus the correct option is C.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement suggests that making university education free might lead students to slack off and learn less due to a perceived lack of investment. While this viewpoint raises a valid concern about the potential devaluation of education in the absence of financial commitment, it oversimplifies a complex issue.
It neglects to consider various crucial aspects, such as the societal benefits of an educated populace, the impact of socioeconomic factors on access to education, and the potential for increased equality and economic growth when education is more accessible.
Moreover, research on the correlation between free education and student motivation is inconclusive. While some studies indicate a relationship between tuition fees and academic commitment, others show that removing financial barriers can enhance inclusivity and encourage a wider range of students to pursue higher education.
Thus, the argument lacks the depth and comprehensive analysis required to take a definitive stance on whether university-level education should be universally free. It falls in the middle ground, failing to strongly oppose or support free education for all students due to its narrow focus on a single aspect without considering the broader implications and potential societal benefits.
Therefore, the correct option is C.