Final answer:
The claim that corporate cults are preferred because they suppress subcultures is false. Subcultures add to the richness and adaptability of an organization, making it more dynamic and innovative. option b.
Step-by-step explanation:
The notion that corporate cults are preferred because they help suppress subcultures within organizations is false. While cults in the broad sense of culture, including corporate cultures, may exhibit strong sets of values and norms that could potentially diminish the existence of subcultures, this does not inherently make them preferred. Subcultures have their own consistent beliefs and behaviors that bind them together, contributing to a diverse and dynamic organizational environment. Examples of subcultures that may exist within an organization include doomsday preppers, gopniks, or cholos, each with their specific set of values and practices. In an organizational context, subcultures can offer different perspectives, innovation, and adaptability that enrich corporate culture rather than undermine it. Hence, it’s a complex balance between ensuring a unifying corporate culture and allowing subcultures to flourish to the benefit of organizational dynamism and flexibility.