Based on the drama, Earhart's role as the commander of the flight was only in name, as she was not allowed to take control or make decisions.
From the details provided, it's evident that Amelia Earhart's purported command of the flight was largely symbolic rather than substantive.
The drama highlights this by showcasing instances where her authority is overridden or restricted.
Firstly, Earhart's lack of autonomy in decision-making is evident when the Lady Principals, her advisors or companions, restrain her from taking control and instead encourage her to respond through actions rather than words.
This limitation on her ability to make crucial decisions or exert command authority suggests that her role as commander was nominal, with others directing the course of action.
Secondly, the declaration of war by the king due to the Queen's refusal to comply with certain demands indicates that Earhart's authority was not recognized or respected at a fundamental level.
The fact that a decision made by the Queen, presumably against the king's wishes, resulted in such a severe consequence highlights the absence of Earhart's real command over the flight.
Her inability to influence or prevent this drastic outcome underscores her lack of actual control or influence in critical matters.
These details suggest that while Earhart may have held the title of commander, her practical ability to lead or govern the flight was curtailed or disregarded, signifying that her role was more symbolic than substantive.