Final answer:
C. Integrative bargaining leads to a win-win solution where all parties involved negotiate to reach an outcome that serves each party's interests. This method is in contrast to competitive bargaining, which aims for one side to win at the expense of the other.
Step-by-step explanation:
Integrative bargaining occurs when both parties negotiate a win-win solution. This type of bargaining is indicative of a scenario where the involved parties aim for an agreement that serves all sides' interests, unlike competitive or distributive bargaining, where the focus is on one party winning at the expense of the other. In the realm of international relations and political bargaining, compromise is most likely to be achieved when all participants have a general agreement on their overarching goals but might have different perspectives on how to get there. This can be seen in negotiations on environmental policies, where countries may agree on the end goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions but have different targets in mind.
In collective decision-making, a bias may exist toward maintaining the status quo, however, when an agreement is reached through compromise, it is often because each party finds value in securing part of their goals over none. The concept of compromise in bargaining underscores a critical aspect of resolving conflicts in politics — finding a collective resolution that, while not ideal, is satisfactory to all parties involved.