Final answer:
Source B outlines Alexander the Great's military genius, leadership qualities, and cultural influence, presenting evidence of his ability to inspire loyalty and effectively conquer and manage diverse cultures, which supports the argument that Alexander was indeed 'great.'
Step-by-step explanation:
When studying Source B for insights on why Alexander may be considered 'great,' several key points stand out. Alexander was not only a military genius and courageous warrior, but he also demonstrated exceptional qualities as a leader. His ability to inspire loyalty across different cultures, including the Greeks and the peoples of the Persian Empire, underscores his political acumen. Moreover, his conquests were instrumental in the spread of Greek culture across the vast territories he subdued. His policies of making alliances and offering fair concessions to conquered peoples, instead of imposing ruinous terms, allowed for a relatively smooth transition of power, preserving stability and goodwill towards his rule.
Furthermore, Alexander's education under Aristotle and ambition to be like Achilles indicate a man driven by high ideals and intellectual pursuits, aligning with the concept of 'greatness' in a leader. His military tactics, such as defeating larger Persian forces by engaging with smaller detachments and strategically taking key locations, attest to his innovative and effective military strategies. Even the Roman mosaic (Figure 8.2.1), though a secondary representation, likely based on a Greek original, celebrates his prowess in battle, capturing the essence of his legendary status as a warrior.
Thus, Source B can be utilized to argue that Alexander's achievements in military strategy, leadership qualities, cultural influence, and political wisdom collectively contribute to his legacy as 'Alexander the Great.'