Final answer:
The Black Panther Party advocated for armed self-defense, Black Nationalism, and establishing self-reliant black communities with black leadership, in contrast to the SCLC's nonviolent integrationist approach. They were influenced by Malcolm X and did not shy away from the use of violence to fight police brutality and to gain media attention.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Black Panther Party for Self-Defense differed from Martin Luther King Jr.'s Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in several ways, primarily through their methods and ideology. One of the primary differences was that the Black Panther Party promoted armed self-defense and Black Nationalism, unlike the SCLC's commitment to nonviolence and integration. While the Panthers did not specifically aim to create a new state for black people, they did believe in establishing separate and self-reliant black communities with black leadership, fundamentally diverging from King's vision of a racially integrated society.
Unlike the SCLC, the Black Panthers were willing to use violent confrontation as a strategy to combat police brutality and to draw national media attention to their cause. They were influenced by radical figures like Malcolm X and embraced a more militant approach to civil rights. While both groups sought to promote equal voting rights, the ways in which they pursued this and other aspects of social justice differed massively. The Panthers' Survival Programs, such as free breakfast for children, education, and healthcare, showcased their dedication to building autonomous black communities within American society.