Final answer:
The question addresses the passage of a Filipino-rejected law by the U.S. Congress, referencing the override of a Presidential veto. The historical context alludes to the Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934, which reclassified Filipinos as noncitizen aliens and granted the Philippines independence by 1944.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to an instance where a Filipino-rejected law was passed by the intervention of U.S. senators, yet the U.S. Congress ratified it by overriding a veto. In such cases, if the President vetoes legislation, it can only become law if two-thirds of both the House and the Senate vote in favor of it. This process is known as an override of the Presidential veto. The historical context provided suggests discussing the Tydings-McDuffie Act of 1934, which granted independence to the Philippines by 1944 and reclassified all Filipinos as noncitizen aliens, effectively limiting their migration to the U.S. It appears that the enactment of this law over the Presidential veto reflected a complex interplay of domestic politics, racial prejudices, and strategic interests.
The implementation of the Tydings-McDuffie Act and the subsequent restriction on Filipino migrants can be seen as part of a broader pattern of American imperialism and the evolution of U.S. immigration policy in the early 20th century. The act not only affected Filipino independence movements but also mirrored domestic attitudes towards immigration and the role of the United States in world affairs during that period.