27.6k views
5 votes
Once developed and implemented, action plans operate on "autopilot," without the need for managerial monitoring, evaluation, and adjustment

User Sorcrer
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Action plans in business or organizational contexts require consistent managerial oversight and cannot simply operate on 'autopilot.' They must be adaptable to align with goals, respond to changes, and ensure their continued relevance and effectiveness. Clear timelines, SMART goals, and the ability to make adjustments are crucial for the sustainability of action plans.

Step-by-step explanation:

Action Plans and Managerial Oversight

The idea that once developed and implemented, action plans operate on "autopilot", without the need for managerial monitoring, evaluation, and adjustment, is a common misconception. In the context of business or organizational strategy, action plans require consistent oversight to ensure they are aligning with set goals and adapting to any changes in circumstances or market forces. Clear timelines and SMART goals are indeed a critical part of the action plan, providing a structured framework for teams to follow.

However, as revealed by the insights from behavioral economics, and observations in the realms of regional and statewide planning, the successful implementation of plans often depends on continual adaptation and reassessment. For example, programs that do not have dedicated staff or are operating under financial constraints may struggle to maintain their course without active management. The involvement of program managers is essential to make evaluations simple and doable, and to understand "what is being done" and "why it is being done."

In academic settings, the formulation of a plan may be pursued without immediate concern for application, allowing for an extensive and potentially global scope. However, in most practical scenarios, consistent oversight from managers is indispensable. This includes the philosophical shift from a state of the world where a "no plan" approach might have worked, to a new reality where human impact on the planet necessitates global action plans and conscious steering.

Furthermore, automatic-enrollment plans for savings in behavioral economics show the benefit and necessity of default settings in certain aspects, but this does not negate the need for oversight and the ability to opt-out or modify one's course—paralleling the need for adaptability in action plans. In summary, while initial development and setup of action plans can offer a route to success, they invariably require dynamic management to respond to internal and external pressures and opportunities.

User Louic
by
8.2k points