Final answer:
Primate city development can lead to imbalances in national investment, exacerbate regional inequalities, and result in overpopulation and environmental issues due to the concentration of resources and population in a single city.
Step-by-step explanation:
An argument against primate city development can be based on the concentration of resources and population leading to economic disparities and potential neglect of other regions. Large primate cities, like London, Rome, or Paris, dominate their respective countries in terms of size, economy, and political influence. This overwhelming dominance can result in an imbalance where these cities receive a disproportionate amount of investment and attention, often at the expense of other cities and rural areas. This can exacerbate regional inequalities and limit national economic diversity. Moreover, such urban centers may face issues like overpopulation, environmental degradation, and infrastructure strain. These problems may stem from rapid and often uncontrolled urbanization that outpaces the ability of the city to provide adequate services and housing for all residents. The resulting challenges include traffic congestion, pollution, and an increased cost of living, which can negatively impact the quality of life.