Final answer:
The Perry Project resulted in stronger conservation support in project villages, signs of reduced prejudice, and highlighted the value of cooperation and harmony with nature. Despite these positives, there was little to no evidence of the project systematically impacting communities. Evaluators contributed to outreach, interpreting results, and disseminating findings through publications and a website.
Step-by-step explanation:
The findings of the Perry Project are multi-faceted, with various outcomes and impacts on different levels. The evaluators of the project were heavily involved in the process, assisting in outreach and interpreting survey results. Despite the engagement of evaluators and participants, comparisons between project villages and non-project villages showed no significant difference, suggesting that project participation had little to no systematic impact on local communities or nationally. However, a questionnaire survey found that there was stronger conservation support in project villages than in non-project villages. This indicates that the project may have had some successes, particularly in enhancing environmental values among these communities.
Moreover, signs of reduced prejudice were observed by the end of the camp. Additionally, the project involved gathering data on the local environment, culture, and practices, highlighting that the people valued cooperation and harmony with nature. Researchers and evaluators have co-authored articles, prepared manuscripts, and developed a website to detail the process and findings of the Perry Project.