Why were no weapons of mass destruction actually used?

Chevaughn asked Sep 7, 2023

509,904 views

9 votes

Chevaughn asked Sep 7, 2023

3.0k points

Your comment on this question:

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:Email me if a comment is added after mine

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:Email me if my answer is selected or commented on

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

19 votes

Answer:

it would not mean the end of civilization. conflict would be slower and immediately less destructive than a nuclear one

Sigal answered Sep 13, 2023

by Sigal

3.3k points

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:Email me if a comment is added after mine

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

1.6m questions

2.0m answers