106k views
4 votes
"don’t touch that frog," warned prof. shuman, startling poor kristina who drew her hand away. "its skin secretes poison," he then explained.

- Remove the comma between frog and warned.
- Add a comma between Krishna and who.
- Add a comma between he and then.
- No change is necessary.

User Matthewgdv
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The proper use of commas should not interfere with the essential meaning of a sentence. In the provided sentence, the commas serve a purpose, and altering them may affect the sentence's clarity. Thus, no change is necessary as the commas are correctly used as per standard guidelines.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student's question is based on the proper use of commas within a sentence. Punctuation guidelines stipulate that you should not place commas around information that is essential to the meaning of a sentence. The correct approach is to ensure that punctuation serves to clarify meaning and does not disrupt the essential elements of a sentence. Hence, removing commas that enclose nonessential elements and adding commas to separate clauses can improve the readability and understanding of a sentence. Commas are also used to separate items in a series, but they are not necessary if they enclose essential information.

In the context of the example sentence provided by the student, the proposed changes to the sentence's commas would likely alter the essential meaning or clarity of the sentence. For instance, adding a comma between the subject and the restrictive relative clause can introduce ambiguity, which is not recommended in clear, professional writing.

User Mogikan
by
7.1k points