51.0k views
5 votes
How are Klev Schoening's feelings about the expedition today different from Krakauer's?

a) Schoening regrets being part of the expedition.
b) Schoening has fond memories of the expedition.
c) Krakauer still blames himself for the tragedy.
d) Krakauer believes the expedition was a success.

User Joe Green
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The question asks for a comparison of Klev Schoening's and Jon Krakauer's feelings about an expedition. Schoening may hold some form of fond nostalgia, while Krakauer is likely inclined toward self-blame or reflection on the tragic aspects.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question regarding the feelings of Klev Schoening and Jon Krakauer about the expedition likely refers to their experiences chronicled in connection with a high-stakes mountaineering expedition, such as the 1996 Mount Everest disaster covered by Krakauer in 'Into Thin Air'. In contrasting their feelings post-expedition, it's important to consider the nuanced and personal nature of their reflections. Although not directly stated in the question, it can be inferred that:

  • Klev Schoening may have mixed emotions that could include fond memories of the camaraderie and challenges faced during the expedition, evoking a sense of nostalgia despite any negative outcomes.
  • Jon Krakauer, known for his introspective and sometimes critical perspective, might display feelings of regret or self-blame in relation to the tragedy, pondering on what could have been done differently to avoid the unfortunate events.

Ultimately, Krakauer's documented feelings tend to revolve around somber reflection and a critical analysis of the events, which contrasts with Schoening who might look back with a degree of positivity about certain aspects of the experience.

User Mcating
by
7.7k points