Final answer:
The most accurate option seems to be Option 1, where the first part of the section provides historical context, the Cheyenne story introduces a different perspective, and the last part concludes the narrative, based on common narrative structures.
Step-by-step explanation:
To answer the question regarding the difference between the first part of the section titled "rolling head," the Cheyenne story, and the last part, we can eliminate some options based on the text provided. Option 3, which mentions different tenses (present, past, future), is not supported by the reference information. Additionally, Option 4, which talks about distinct narrative perspectives (first, third, and second person), is not substantiated by the given excerpts. Therefore, considering the structure of narratives and storytelling devices, and without having access to the full text for a more in-depth analysis, it seems that Option 1 aligns best with common narrative practices. This option suggests that the first part provides historical context, the Cheyenne story introduces a different perspective, and the last part concludes the narrative. This analysis is in line with typical narrative structures, where a story often begins with an introductory context, presents varying perspectives or sub-stories, and concludes with an endpoint or resolution.