Final answer:
The lack of enforcement of the Sixth Amendment led to cases such as Gideon v. Wainwright, which ensured legal counsel to those who could not afford it, and Miranda v. Arizona, which required suspects to be informed of their rights before police questioning.
Step-by-step explanation:
Laws Passed as a Result of the Sixth Amendment's Lack of Enforcement
The lack of enforcement of the 6th Amendment, which guarantees the right of those accused of crimes to have the assistance of an attorney, led to significant Supreme Court decisions. Among these, Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) stands out as a landmark case wherein the justices unanimously ruled that the Sixth Amendment required states to provide an attorney to felony defendants who could not afford one. This case had a profound impact on the criminal court system, ensuring that all accused of serious crimes are entitled to legal counsel, whether or not they can afford it. Another consequential law that arose in the wake of the 6th Amendment's enforcement issues was Miranda v. Arizona (1966), which established that suspects must be 'read their rights', now known as Miranda rights, before being questioned by law enforcement. These landmark rulings have ensured the expansion of rights for the accused and have had a lasting effect on the legal system, solidifying the principles that everyone is entitled to a fair trial and that the burden of proof is on the prosecutor's side.