Final answer:
Plato's reply might highlight the continuous relevance of philosophical inquiry, stating that despite advances in neuroscience, philosophical questions and critical reflection on concepts like knowledge, truth, and morality remain crucial. Philosophy contributes a dimension of thought that complements empirical sciences, emphasizing the importance of both for a life worth living.
Step-by-step explanation:
Plato's hypothetical reply to Dr. Shoket's question about what's left for philosophers to ponder, with neuroscientists explaining consciousness, free will, and morality, might emphasize the enduring relevance of philosophical inquiry. Even as neuroscience progresses, philosophical questions persist about the nature of knowledge, the existence of abstract entities such as Forms, and the applications of ethical and political concepts in real life. Plato believed that truth is not just a matter of empirical observation but also requires rigorous discussion and contemplation. The essence of philosophy lies in its ability to guide the exploration of such truths, which remain essential despite advances in empirical sciences.
Furthermore, the interplay between deterministic views and moral responsibility exemplifies why philosophical reflection remains crucial. A philosopher might craft scenarios to study people's beliefs about moral responsibility in the absence of free choice, exploring the implications if science suggests free will is an illusion. It is the role of philosophy to continue examining such deep and complex issues, contributing a dimension of critical thinking and ethical reasoning that complements scientific understanding.
Ultimately, Plato's philosophy points to a higher, unchanging reality of Forms, like goodness and beauty, suggesting there is always a place for philosophical contemplation alongside scientific explanation. By engaging with philosophical methods, we can better understand and make sense of the world around us, which is an integral part of a life worth living.